You are here: Home » the first 6 seconds » Techsmith did it again with Jing Pro… sort of

Techsmith did it again with Jing Pro… sort of

by David M. Doolin, PhD on October 15, 2009 · 10 comments

Here’s an excellent snapshot of my emotional state right after I upgraded to Jing Pro. I thought about just not publishing this, because I end up chumping myself worse than Jing Pro, but there are a couple of valid points to consider:

  1. Jing has several really non-standard user interface “features” which I am not sure benefit users. To be more specific, Jing has some important user interface innovations… and some gratuitous changes of no clear benefit to anyone (that is, me). I’ll save a specific suggestion for a future post, this is getting long enough already.
  2. Whether I’m right or wrong, other people have had similar trouble figuring out Software from Techsmith, so it’s in Techsmith’s interest that such diatribes as the following don’t erupt. That is, whether I’m “right” or “wrong,” Techsmith would bear the brunt of having a publicly unhappy customer.

As it turns out, I do have future plans for that more or less glowing report. And I’ll put my endorsement for Jing Pro right here up front: If you make a lot of static screenshots or simple screencasts for blogging,


just go ahead and plunk down the $14.95/yr fee for Jing Pro.

I find absolutely indispensable for blogging, much better than MS Paint for example.

If you have any problems with Jing Pro, email me before you email Techsmith, I may be able to help you quickly.

I’m putting the following rant out there raw, stream of consciousness, with very little editing. Partly I don’t feel like taking the time to clean it up, partly, and the raw version gets you a better snapshot of my emotional state as I pounded through the process.

Ok, on to the rant…

Purchasing Jing Pro (rant)

I really, really wanted to write a glowing report on my experience with using the Pro version of Jing.

After really taking some time to figure out how to use the free version, I thought I had the skills I need.

But the Pro version is slightly different, in an important way, which I’ll get to later.

My technology chain for the current project has an .swf embedded in a sales page, which I really, really wanted to take live today.

But the Pro Version of Jing doesn’t save as .swf. When I tried to “Save As” .swf from the dialog box, there is no option for that. It saves as mp4. Which is run as Quicktime in my browsers. Which runs automatically and blasts my voice to the world at large… before the prospect even gets the chance at reading my headline.

That’s NDG at all.

So I’m now 30 minutes into a researching how to set a remote Quicktime client to NOT play automatically (it’s a user option so far as I know now), or converting the .mp4 file into a .swf file. The conversion is probably easy… provided I purchase the correct application… but which application is best? More research…

So, I’m absolutely astonished at this turn of events.

I’m going to take the sales page “live” without the screencast, I just don’t have anymore time. I resent that I spent a couple of hours yesterday rehearsing this with the promotional free version, to find that the Pro version requires me changing how I deliver the technology. Because I simply will NOT risk users getting an audio blast BEFORE they even read the headline.

I may consider using the free version instead. It has a link to Techsmith at the end of the screencast, which will adversely affect conversion, but not as much as getting blasted off the page.

And that’s my time budget for this project. I won’t have time to unscrew it until September 9 when I get back from Burning Man.

Folks, if you sell stuff, or even give stuff away that you want people to use, please adhere very tightly to The Principle of Least Astonishment.

More: Quicktime isn’t compatible with 64 bit Windows. Do a Google search on “Quicktime blacked out controls.” Quicktime Pro is 29.95, and gets a big 2.5 stars for rating.

More and more: I did find something that would convert from mp4 to swf. It’s ignoring the autoplay “false” directive. This particular piece of software reinvented standard user interface practice, too. More astonishment. It has a pro version. No thanks.

These are the same piece of software, advertised here: http://www.webdesignforums.net/photoshop_flash_and_other_graphics_8/convert_mp4_to_swf_24020.html to convert from .mp4 to .swf, but they don’t:

you can try these software applications to see if its something that you think may help you.

Xilisoft MP4 Converter 3.1

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multime…onverter.shtml

ImTOO MP4 Video Converter 3.1.5.0430b

http://www.softpedia.com/get/Multime…onverter.shtml

Yet another link took me to a malware site.

I have a newsletter announcement waiting to go out.

AVSStudio ran a System Modal on me… locked me out of writing this post. That almost produced a flash of rage… fortunately, I don’t suffer from that. But I could feel it. They also put a watermark banner in the output file… $49.95. Another 15 minutes wasted.

An enraged customer.

Nice.

I should probably just outsource all this. I know for a fact someone in Eastern Europe who does this kind of work pretty cheap. He doesn’t pay for any software. He just uses cracked versions. Keeps his overhead low.

I don’t have any problem paying for software.

I’ve paid for a colossal amount of software in fact, most of which I don’t use. Most of the software I actually use is free software.

Now, I’ve uninstalled, then reinstalled Jing, trying to get the free version back… but it gets me the Pro version again…

However, on the reinstall, I find the documentation stating file preferences are set such that the output format cannot be changed when you’re saving the screencast. This is very confusing because the user interface for the screencast implies choice. It’s a combo box. This is a serious WTF?

I understand “making things simple,” but displaying a combo box with a single choice – when the software is capable of other choices – is really dumb. That’s not simplifying the software. It’s astonishing the user.

Techsmith’s problem in my mind is now this: using their software is going to astonish me in ways I cannot anticipate. This means I’m going to have to budget open-ended time when I use Techsmith tools. Just like programming… without the feeling of accomplishment. And there isn’t anything they can really do about it now, because the emotional trigger is hard-wired into me. Because of my experiences, any time I run into difficulty, I’m going to feel imposed upon, confused and angry.

We have a saying back in the country: “Don’t fix what ain’t broke.”

This was a couple hours of my time. Let’s call it hours. That’s about $250 worth of consulting from my company. Figure my base rate at $50/hr, 100% overhead, ~20% profit (reasonable), comes out to about $125/hr.

If this seems high, go talk to someone that actually runs a technology company and pays people what their worth. If anything, it’s low.

If I didn’t really like their products… I wouldn’t be having such a reaction.

Now I have to re-record the screencast.

So much for the rant

Ok, rant over.

I felt embarrassed and frustrated when I realized that the file type chosen for saving is set in the global options interface, and not through the Save As dialog box.

I find this really annoying because it’s not how I would have coded the application myself. In fact, the last major desktop application I worked on had this same kind of system: One set of users got the ability to save to certain file types, other users to more extensive selection of file types. But we didn’t change the interface, the Save As dialog dealt with all of it transparently.

Thus my pique at what I felt should something extremely simple…

Someday, I need to make a list of all the software I have purchased. And emphasize that I am not using the vast majority of that software anymore. It’s a long list. And I want to be really clear that none of these little software engineering rants of mine mean I want everything for free. Far from it. Just want it to work.

{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }

Scott June 14, 2010 at 4:55 pm

David,

I don’t know for certain, but I believe that I’m having the same problem that you have. (I’m not sure because I have zero patience left to even read your post in its entirety), but basically, I’ve just upgraded to Jing Pro AFTER I’ve already recorded a screencast with Jing and I’m wanting to save it in MP4 format, but I’m not able to convert it from SWF. I’ve spent hours trying to figure this out but still have not had any luck.

It seems as though you finally figured this out at the end of your post. Can you help me?

Reply

Dave Doolin | Website In A Weekend June 14, 2010 at 5:01 pm

Yeah, you have to set the file format using the little round doohickey on your screen. The gear thing that is tooltipped “More.”

I’ve made my peace with it now.

It’s definitely not how I would have designed it, and I do have that much UI design, to be able to choose output formats using the standard “Save as” technique. Not that hard. I’ve never gotten a clear answer why they did it this way. The only reason I would do it this way would be for marketing purposes, to induce an upgrade to Snag it or Camtasia. If that’s why they’re doing it they should just say so. I don’t really have a problem with that, just want to know.
Dave Doolin | Website In A Weekend´s last [type] ..I unlaunched the **** out of my ebook – Navarro & Dunford done bass ackwards

Reply

Thomas Rees April 1, 2011 at 2:13 pm

David — I am coming in here a year later hoping they cleaned up some of these problems. The new pro says it uploads to Utube directly, but I have a bunch of swf files that I had imagined I can upload. At this point in March 2011, am I going to find that Pro locks me into MP4 and converting back to swf PROHIBITS the upload to Utube? Any input would be great. Tom

Reply

David M. Doolin, PhD April 7, 2011 at 9:36 am

Tom,

I think you’re gonna have to convert elsewhere, and just use Jing for mp4 directly.

At the end I figured out the correct settings, so I’m back in business with the screencasts.

The Pro version is very good, and very reasonably priced, totally recommend it, just drive between the lines.

I need to update the post. Overall I’m really happy with Jing Pro. This incident was just frustrating moment in time.

Thanks for stopping by!
David M. Doolin, PhD´s last [type] ..Business Outsourcing- Advantages and Disadvantages People still matter most!

Reply

Chief April 11, 2011 at 2:08 pm

David,
I was about ready to sign up for Jing Pro until I read this post. Primarily attracted by th edirect upload to YouTube. Your information has caused me to consider more options. Thanks!

Reply

David M. Doolin, PhD April 11, 2011 at 2:29 pm

You should buy it. It’s cheap, $14.95 or something.

Seriously, I use it all the time, and for the price it can’t be beat.

Just make sure you set the file type correctly in advance, that’s all.
David M. Doolin, PhD´s last [type] ..Business Partnering- Leverage the strength of others

Reply

Adam Dukes May 17, 2011 at 10:30 pm

I had my finger on the trigger to buy the Pro version to, but after reading this post I am hesitant. I have never used Jing before and have spent a couple hours just trying to figure out how to use it (clipboard, embed, etc)

I am just looking to create a screenshot of a video and I can embed it into an email to send to clients.

Any ideas?

Thanks for the post and any help.

Reply

Dave Doolin May 17, 2011 at 11:32 pm

Adam, I’d say go for it. It’s pretty cheap, really. Overall I’m happy with it and use it quite a bit.

Another thing which is cool is that you can put the screencasts into longer movie files.

So, go for it!

Reply

Jay January 9, 2012 at 10:15 am

Hello Dave,

I read all your posts and replies.
I am scared to buy Jing Pro.
In the end, how did you manage to stop the video from blasting before your readers got to read your headline?
I mean which screencast software service would you recommend?
Also, which video player/hosting would you recommend so that screencasts can play seemlessly on all types of browers?

Thanks!
Jay´s last [type] ..Monthly Installment of Links to Free or Almost Free Stuff!

Reply

Deb January 20, 2012 at 1:16 pm

THANK YOU for this post! I found it while doing a quick search for a promo code for the pro version of Jing (I know… it only $15/year, but I’m a compulsive coupon shopper…). Knowing that it changes the learning curve…which costs more in time than anything, is priceless. Ease of use is worth paying for. Would love to know what anyone else has found that works for screenshots and short instructional videos. Is SnagIt or even Comtasia worth the $$? Love to know.
Thanks again. Staying with the free Jing for now!
Deb´s last [type] ..Another Great Design Tool

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv badge

Previous post:

Next post: